[War_ooc] A thought: Rename the game!
Dylan de Valk
dylandv at gmail.com
Sun Apr 20 16:20:41 EDT 2008
"I leave you with the 34th rule of Acquisition: War is good for business."
Agreed.
But yea, I do like World Alliances and Rivalries. The other names that came
up were good too, but then we would have a mismatched website. And that
would make a problem worse.
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Patrick B <pbuck11 at aol.com> wrote:
> Ok, we are now rearranging deck chairs on the titantic, it was called
> WAR, let's just keep it bloody damned WAR.
>
> And John, there is nothing wrong with conflict, like a warfare, only if
> done right, the reason wars usually sucked in WAR was the crew ended up
> lobbing nukes back and forth within 6 posts and some how the US and the
> UK ended up at each other's throats.
>
> I leave you with the 34th rule of Acquisition: War is good for business.
>
> _______________________________________________
> War_ooc mailing list
> War_ooc at esteroic.com
> http://esteroic.com/mailman/listinfo/war_ooc_esteroic.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://esteroic.com/pipermail/war_ooc_esteroic.com/attachments/20080420/2f69110c/attachment.html
More information about the War_ooc
mailing list