[War_ooc] WAR's status (Was: Heeeeeeeelllooooooooooooooo?)
John Penta
john.penta at gmail.com
Sun Dec 21 14:18:12 EST 2008
I think, at the moment, WAR may best be described as being in a state
of...I dunno what to call it. I don't think anybody wants to declare
the game *dead*, but rather that it's probably shelved until that
indeterminate point in the future that it resurrects. Has in the past,
after all.
Which could be next week, could be in a few months. It seems RL
managed to claim a lot of us, and also - WAR is a *hard* game, both to
run and to play with quality, as we've all seen. This is a good thing,
but it occasionally means that setting it aside is a good thing, too.
Me, personally? I'm diving into the odd Trek PBEM, plus a new MUSH
(also Trek)...or, rather, returning to a MUSH I used to play on.
Maybe in a while my batteries will be recharged to take on WAR again.
Maybe not. I dunno.
Such is my perspective, may be that of others, too.
Personally? If WAR resurrects, woohoo. Maybe not immediately, but
eventually, I figure I'd play again. If not, okay. It's been - what,
10 years running in its various iterations, almost?
It could be that we've played it out. Either way, it's been fun. From
my own perspective, WAR has been a chance for me to explore so many
things, so many ideas. Which has been great.
John
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Iain <iain at iain-waddell.co.uk> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
>
>
> Anyone out there? What's going on? Are we done?
>
>
>
> Iain
>
> _______________________________________________
> War_ooc mailing list
> War_ooc at esteroic.com
> http://esteroic.com/mailman/listinfo/war_ooc_esteroic.com
>
>
More information about the War_ooc
mailing list