[War_ooc] Holy shit that's a lot of posts (Was Re: Okay, so...)

[Michael Downey]

1. Cool.

2. By thine command.

3. As I have nether, I don't care which one you pick.

I'm not volunteering to do it because I am software-inept, but the
Wikia idea seems simple It's free (I think?) simple (for people who
aren't me) and accessable. I think someone brought up the worry about
vandalism, but is that *really* a concern? No one in our group is
going to do it and I don't think people go trolling for wiki sites of
eight members to vandalize.

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 7:32 PM, John Penta<john.penta at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, exactly.
>
> That's 50+ posts in UNDER 2 hours, guys.
>
> Wow.
>
> Okay, what I've determined from the last 2 hours:
>
> 1. We're going with the near-future setting. Seems to be the consensus
> anyway.
>
> 2. We're not going with post scales, etc.
>
> 3. I'm seriously thinking of making AIM mandatory. No, not kidding. I can
> use AIM or MSN, but everybody seems to use AIM already.
> What's next:
>
> Who wants to volunteer to do advertising, web design, graphics?
>
> Even just one person per task would be good.
>
> While we get that started...Actually, no. BEFORE I start work on the
> timeline and stuff, I want to see people lined up for that stuff. Only way
> it'll get done.:)
>
> Does anyone have any quibbles on timeline date? My persnickety side wants to
> start in an off-year (2013, 2017, etc) like last time.
>
> John
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 5:48 PM, <lee.tarnow at utoronto.ca> wrote:
>>
>> My argument would be that it relies on us to not have a subjective
>> viewpoint -- which, speaking from an educated standpoint, is naive at
>> best. Anyway, John's not interested, so the point is gone.
>
> _______________________________________________
> War_ooc mailing list
> War_ooc at esteroic.com
> http://esteroic.com/mailman/listinfo/war_ooc_esteroic.com
>
>