[War_ooc] John gets to thinking.

John Penta john.penta at gmail.com
Sat Jun 27 11:36:07 EDT 2009


Agree to what? I never stated any opinion either way.

The WRs...On the one hand, they're a bit of a pain for the GM (and
anyone they rope into helping). They take research and no small amount of
discretion. On the other hand, I'm not sure letting players 'define their
own success' is a good idea.
Oh, in addition: Dan, I don't know why, but it's impossible to crop what you
write - could you please try to only quote relevant parts of messages, not
the whole message, in future?

John

On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Daniel Sanderson <
dantheman2210 at yahoo.com.au> wrote:

>   I agree bout the World Reports. They seem to always cause stress, and be
> spoken of like a chore. I think, provided people exercise common
> sense/realism, they can define their own rate of growth, population,
> approval ratings (obviously if someone keeps saying they're 98% they need to
> be pulled up on that!).
>
> --- On *Sun, 28/6/09, John Penta <john.penta at gmail.com>* wrote:
>
>
> From: John Penta <john.penta at gmail.com>
> Subject: [War_ooc] John gets to thinking.
> To: war_ooc at esteroic.com
> Received: Sunday, 28 June, 2009, 12:40 AM
>
>
>  It's a slow Saturday morning, I have nothing to do, not even anything for
> WAR, so I've gotten to thinking.
>
> Oh, stop hiding.
>
> Thrown out ideas:
>
> WAR FAQ - the more I think about it, the more I think WAR is best explained
> by watching posts come in, the WR go out, etc. Put more succinctly, I'm not
> sure how to go about writing such a FAQ. However, I mention it in case
> someone wants to take a crack at writing such a thing.
>
> Next up, ideas I'm considering:
>
> The WR. Bluntly, do we even need a World Report? If we do, how should it be
> structured? Are there any ways in which we can automate the process (in my
> dreams only, I know)?
>
> Activity requirements - I'm increasingly in favor of this, but it's a
> decision I want to leave up to you. Should WAR have a formal activity
> requirement?
>
> If we do, I doubt I would enforce it as a hard requirement - more of a
> "reach this point or be nagged", with only people turning in nothing
> becoming eligible for removal.
>
> Post counts - One thing I'm definitely thinking of borrowing from other
> sims is posting a weekly or biweekly post count to the OOC list. People,
> I've found, are naturally competitive, and want to reach the top of that
> list. Keep in mind though that only public posts would count. Secret Actions
> would not.
>
> Is there anything else that comes to people's minds?
>
> One brief thing: Even if you have no plans, no chance of playing a country
> yet...Your opinions, your help on the OOC side of this endeavor would still
> be welcome.
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> War_ooc mailing list
> War_ooc at esteroic.com <http://mc/compose?to=War_ooc@esteroic.com>
> http://esteroic.com/mailman/listinfo/war_ooc_esteroic.com
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Access Yahoo!7 Mail on your mobile. Anytime. Anywhere. Show me how<http://au.rd.yahoo.com/mail/mobile/tagline/*http://au.mobile.yahoo.com/mail>
> .
>
> _______________________________________________
> War_ooc mailing list
> War_ooc at esteroic.com
> http://esteroic.com/mailman/listinfo/war_ooc_esteroic.com
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://esteroic.com/pipermail/war_ooc_esteroic.com/attachments/20090627/5bc62e67/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the War_ooc mailing list